Code4Lib - User contributions [en]

User:WillSkora

2019-05-17T12:58:33Z

WillSkora: Created page with " Web developer at Cleveland public library. Hi."

Web developer at Cleveland public library. Hi.

Accessibility

2019-02-21T18:48:25Z

WillSkora: added presentation

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility and was created following a discussion from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L 18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===From C4L 19===

[https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1uQxxxrqPoyuizyFCW_kvVBAbG-F_Qo0uhRnNsnGiim0/edit#slide=id.p Get To Know WCAG 2.1] - An overview of WCAG 2.1 by Carli Spina

===Other resources===
[https://github.com/mgifford/a11y-courses a11y courses] - comprehensive list of trainings and courses on web accessibility

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

[https://pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca/pwaa/ Professional Web Accessibility Auditing Made Easy] - by Digital Education Strategies, The Chang School. A liberally CC-licensed e-book on how to assess a website for accessibility

===Accessibility and Digital Collections===

[https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2001/papers/anable/anable.html Wright State's University's Guide for writing alt-text for historical art] - also could be applicable for historical images and photographs

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to verify the responses by manual testing.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their respective municipality.

Others (NYPL) that are self-managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

For example:
Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

[https://cpl.org/aboutthelibrary/usingthelibrary/accessibility/ Cleveland Public Library's Web Accessibility Policy]

[https://kcls.org/accessibility/ King County (Washington) Library System's Accessibility Policy]

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive and does not include any academic institutions whose libraries may or may not have been included in the complaint)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-12-28T18:31:23Z

WillSkora: added wright state link, although it's pub'd from 2001, still useful

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility and was created following a discussion from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L 18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===
[https://github.com/mgifford/a11y-courses a11y courses] - comprehensive list of trainings and courses on web accessibility

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

[https://pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca/pwaa/ Professional Web Accessibility Auditing Made Easy] - by Digital Education Strategies, The Chang School. A liberally CC-licensed e-book on how to assess a website for accessibility

===Accessibility and Digital Collections===

[https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2001/papers/anable/anable.html Wright State's University's Guide for writing alt-text for historical art] - also could be applicable for historical images and photographs

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to verify the responses by manual testing.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their respective municipality.

Others (NYPL) that are self-managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

For example:
Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

[https://cpl.org/aboutthelibrary/usingthelibrary/accessibility/ Cleveland Public Library's Web Accessibility Policy]

[https://kcls.org/accessibility/ King County (Washington) Library System's Accessibility Policy]

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive and does not include any academic institutions whose libraries may or may not have been included in the complaint)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-12-13T18:23:36Z

WillSkora: /* Web Accessibility Policies */

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility and was created following a discussion from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L 18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===
[https://github.com/mgifford/a11y-courses a11y courses] - comprehensive list of trainings and courses on web accessibility

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

[https://pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca/pwaa/ Professional Web Accessibility Auditing Made Easy] - by Digital Education Strategies, The Chang School. A liberally CC-licensed in-depth e-book on how to assess a website for accessibility

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their respective municipality.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

For example:
Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

[https://cpl.org/aboutthelibrary/usingthelibrary/accessibility/ Cleveland Public Library's Web Accessibility Policy]

[https://kcls.org/accessibility/ King County (Washington) Library System's Accessibility Policy]

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive and does not include any academic institutions whose libraries may or may not have been included in the complaint)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-11-15T16:16:47Z

WillSkora: fixed formatting, added link to e-book

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility and was created following a discussion from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L 18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===
[https://github.com/mgifford/a11y-courses a11y courses] - comprehensive list of trainings and courses on web accessibility

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

[https://pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca/pwaa/ Professional Web Accessibility Auditing Made Easy] - by Digital Education Strategies, The Chang School. A liberally CC-licensed in-depth e-book on how to assess a website for accessibility

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their respective municipality.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

For example:

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

[https://cpl.org/aboutthelibrary/usingthelibrary/accessibility/ Cleveland Public Library's Web Accessibility Policy]

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive and does not include any academic institutions whose libraries may or may not have been included in the complaint)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-11-13T17:23:39Z

WillSkora: ADDED LINK

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility and was created following a discussion from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L 18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===
[https://github.com/mgifford/a11y-courses a11y courses] - comprehensive list of trainings and courses on web accessibility

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their respective municipality.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

For example:

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

[https://cpl.org/aboutthelibrary/usingthelibrary/accessibility/ Cleveland Public Library Web Accessibility Policy

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive and does not include any academic institutions whose libraries may or may not have been included in the complaint)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-11-07T18:56:37Z

WillSkora: small clarifications

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility and was created following a discussion from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L 18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their respective municipality.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

For example:

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

[https://cpl.org/aboutthelibrary/usingthelibrary/accessibility/ Cleveland Public Library Web Accessibility Policy

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive and does not include any academic institutions whose libraries may or may not have been included in the complaint)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-20T20:07:06Z

WillSkora: oops, formatting fix

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility as a result from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their general city.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-20T20:06:42Z

WillSkora: added link to image book

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility as a result from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.
[http://diagramcenter.org/standards-and-practices/accessible-image-sample-book.html The Accessible Image Sample Book by DIAGRAM] - Very instructive guide to make accessible images (charts, maps, diagrams) in an educational contexts. It is also available on [https://github.com/benetech/AccessibleImageSampleBook Github].

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their general city.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-19T20:58:36Z

WillSkora: clarification

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility as a result from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their general city.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint, entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation and improve their website's accessibility.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-19T20:57:26Z

WillSkora: added additional resources, fixed grammar

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility as a result from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

First, what questions should you ask a prospective vendor?

The ASCLA released [https://cpl.org/wp-content/uploads/think_accessible_before_you_buy.pdf Think Accessible Before You Buy: Questions to Ask to Ensure that the Electronic Resources Your Library Plans to Purchase are Accessible]
and includes introductory material explaining terminology related to electronic resources and accessibility.

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their general city.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide equal or equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an separate investigation with each library.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint and entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-19T17:00:32Z

WillSkora:

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility as a result from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

What questions should you ask to assess the accessibility of a vendor's product?

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their general city.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide
did not provide equal/equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an investigation with the libraries.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint and entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Cleveland Public Library, 2018

Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-19T16:59:52Z

WillSkora: added agreements with public libraries and OCR

This page is intended to collect resources related to accessibility as a result from the code4lib 2018 breakout discussions.

==Accessibility Resources==

===From C4L18===

[https://osf.io/um7sn/ Critical Mass Accessibility] - Lightning talk given by Kate Deibel at C4L 2018; A call to create a library accessibility community.

===Other resources===

[https://github.com/brunopulis/awesome-a11y Awesome-A11Y ] - pretty comprehensive list of specifications, guides, articles, and talks.

===Assessing Third Party Vendors for Accessibility===

Before purchasing electronic resources, you should verify if they are accessible and not take the vendor's word (or VPAT).

What questions should you ask to assess the accessibility of a vendor's product?

[https://depts.washington.edu/uwitats/checklist/ The University of Washington] and [https://kent.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bg9QMVI7bqyvPvL Kent State University (KSU)] require prospective vendors to complete a questionnaire. ''The questions on KSU's form can also be viewed as a [https://www.kent.edu/sites/default/files/file/ICT%20vendor%20form%20-%20question%20preview.pdf PDF]''

You'll also want to conduct manual testing based on those responses.

===Web Accessibility Policies===

Some public libraries (Sacramento, Chicago) are officially organized and structured as a government entity underneath and adopt policies of their general city.

Others (NYPL) that are self managed and adopt their own web accessibility policies.

[https://www.nypl.org/policies/web-mobile-accessibility NYPL Web Accessibility Policy]

Chicago Public Library's [https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/info/accessibility/ Bibliocommons policy] and their [https://www.chipublib.org/library-policies/website-accessibility-policy/ general website accessibility policies].

===Accessibility Complaints filed against libraries===
''(This list is not exhaustive)''

[https://nfb.org/national-federation-blind-settles-complaint-against-sacramento-public-library National Federation of the Blind vs. Sacramento Public Library], 2012.

Complaints were to made to the OCR, the Federal Office of Civil Rights (USA), were made in the 2010s, alleging that the referenced library's website and/or electronic resources were not 'accessible' and did not provide
did not provide equal/equivalent access to all patrons. The OCR had found the complaints to have merit and began an investigation with the libraries.

In all cases listed below, the libraries wished to resolved the complaint and entered into agreements with OCR to close the investigation.

Boston Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/01174029-b.pdf 2] (pdf)
Chicago Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/05164048-b.pdf 2] (pdf)
Detroit Public Library, 2016 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/15164038-b.pdf 2] (pdf)
Los Angeles Public Library, 2017 [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-a.pdf 1] and [https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/09154015-b.pdf 2] (pdf)

Accessibility

2018-06-15T17:39:16Z

WillSkora: fixed formatting

Accessibility

2018-06-15T17:28:31Z

WillSkora: added section on assessing 3rd party vendors for accessibility.

Accessibility

2018-05-30T20:57:03Z

WillSkora: added some public libraries' web accessibility policies

Accessibility

2018-02-28T17:43:50Z

WillSkora: added links to talk and resources