Difference between revisions of "Logo Design Process"
(New page: = Logo Design Process = This page will document the process we are undertaking to create a logo for Code4Lib. == History == On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant [http://serials.infomotio...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
= Logo Design Process = | = Logo Design Process = | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200809/1492.html posted a suggestion] on the Code4Lib mailing list that we create a logo for this group. | On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200809/1492.html posted a suggestion] on the Code4Lib mailing list that we create a logo for this group. | ||
| + | |||
| + | There was enough interest expressed that Roy put up an online poll. The result of [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200809/1544.html that vote] indicated a strong interest in creating a logo, but the preferred process for doing so was not clear. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A run-off vote was then held, and "Professional Option 1" [http://dilettantes.code4lib.org/voting_booth/election/results/6 won the vote], which was "We accept Stephanie Brinley's kind offer, request a few different ideas, vote on those ideas to settle on one, and the final version is created from the winning idea." | ||
| + | |||
| + | A [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200811/1993.html call for volunteers] to draft a requirements document was then made, and Ranti Junus and Emily Molanphy volunteered. | ||
Revision as of 16:52, 3 December 2008
Logo Design Process
This page will document the process we are undertaking to create a logo for Code4Lib.
History
On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant posted a suggestion on the Code4Lib mailing list that we create a logo for this group.
There was enough interest expressed that Roy put up an online poll. The result of that vote indicated a strong interest in creating a logo, but the preferred process for doing so was not clear.
A run-off vote was then held, and "Professional Option 1" won the vote, which was "We accept Stephanie Brinley's kind offer, request a few different ideas, vote on those ideas to settle on one, and the final version is created from the winning idea."
A call for volunteers to draft a requirements document was then made, and Ranti Junus and Emily Molanphy volunteered.
