Difference between revisions of "Code4Lib Journal Tech Wishlist"
From Code4Lib
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Things on this page aren't neccesarily consensus, just things people listed as tech wishlist. | Things on this page aren't neccesarily consensus, just things people listed as tech wishlist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * upgrade WordPress! | ||
+ | |||
+ | * uhh, did someone say upgrade Wordpress already? | ||
* Seperate author names in individual fields in db, for better metadata generation. (Then make export of DOAJ metadata use it, to make it a fully automated process!) | * Seperate author names in individual fields in db, for better metadata generation. (Then make export of DOAJ metadata use it, to make it a fully automated process!) | ||
− | * epub and/or PDF export of a complete issue | + | * epub and/or PDF export of a complete issue. ("Anthologize" plugin for PDF? This plugin for epub?: http://blogs.plos.org/mfenner/2011/02/01/epub-wordpress-plugin-released-today/) |
+ | |||
+ | * PDF of individual article | ||
* Include "cite as" text on each page, with several major citation formats filled in with our data. Especially important because we use an "article number", rather than a page number -- which is supported by most citation formats, but it's not obvious from looking at an article what it's "article number" _is_, you have to know to get it from the URL. Makes it hard to cite correctly. | * Include "cite as" text on each page, with several major citation formats filled in with our data. Especially important because we use an "article number", rather than a page number -- which is supported by most citation formats, but it's not obvious from looking at an article what it's "article number" _is_, you have to know to get it from the URL. Makes it hard to cite correctly. | ||
* Automated list of "most viewed articles", from WP statistics or Google Analytics? | * Automated list of "most viewed articles", from WP statistics or Google Analytics? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Investigate usefulness for us: Here is a WordPress plugin designed to implement editorial workflows: http://editflow.org/ | ||
[[Category: Code4Lib Journal]] | [[Category: Code4Lib Journal]] |
Latest revision as of 10:04, 15 September 2012
Things on this page aren't neccesarily consensus, just things people listed as tech wishlist.
- upgrade WordPress!
- uhh, did someone say upgrade Wordpress already?
- Seperate author names in individual fields in db, for better metadata generation. (Then make export of DOAJ metadata use it, to make it a fully automated process!)
- epub and/or PDF export of a complete issue. ("Anthologize" plugin for PDF? This plugin for epub?: http://blogs.plos.org/mfenner/2011/02/01/epub-wordpress-plugin-released-today/)
- PDF of individual article
- Include "cite as" text on each page, with several major citation formats filled in with our data. Especially important because we use an "article number", rather than a page number -- which is supported by most citation formats, but it's not obvious from looking at an article what it's "article number" _is_, you have to know to get it from the URL. Makes it hard to cite correctly.
- Automated list of "most viewed articles", from WP statistics or Google Analytics?
- Investigate usefulness for us: Here is a WordPress plugin designed to implement editorial workflows: http://editflow.org/