Difference between revisions of "ProjectManagement"
From Code4Lib
(New page: == Project Management and Issue Tracking Software == * http://basecamp.com/ Basecamp pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging...) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [[http://basecamp.com/ Basecamp]] pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging | * [[http://basecamp.com/ Basecamp]] pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging | ||
| − | * [[http://www.redmine.org/ Redmine]] pros: open source, software projects, popular among code4lib responders | + | * [[http://www.redmine.org/ Redmine]] pros: open source, software projects, popular among code4lib responders, ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing |
* [[http://asana.com Asana]] pros: free for small groups | * [[http://asana.com Asana]] pros: free for small groups | ||
| − | * [[http://github.com/ GitHub]] pros: free, hosted | + | * [[http://github.com/ GitHub]] pros: free, hosted, ties together ticketing, source code browsing, and documentation wiki |
| − | * [[https://groups.google.com/ Google Groups]] | + | * [[https://groups.google.com/ Google Groups]] pros: free, good for communication, stores older communication in a browsable way. |
* [[https://drive.google.com/ Google Docs]] | * [[https://drive.google.com/ Google Docs]] | ||
| − | * [[https://unfuddle.com/ Unfuddle]] | + | * [[https://unfuddle.com/ Unfuddle]] pros: hosted ticketing system, customizable cons: customizable |
| − | * [[http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/overview Jira]] pros: used by the pros | + | * [[http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/overview Jira]] pros: used by the pros cons: costs $$, nightmare to maintain |
| − | * [[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki]] pros: powers code4lib wiki | + | * [[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki]] pros: powers code4lib wiki, open source, customizable, easy for all to use |
* [[https://trello.com/ Trello]] | * [[https://trello.com/ Trello]] | ||
* [[https://minigroup.com/ Minigroup]] | * [[https://minigroup.com/ Minigroup]] | ||
* [[http://pbworks.com/ PBWorks]] | * [[http://pbworks.com/ PBWorks]] | ||
* [[http://trac.edgewall.org/ Trac]] pros: ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing | * [[http://trac.edgewall.org/ Trac]] pros: ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing | ||
| + | * [[http://openatrium.com/ Open Atrium]] pros: drupal distro, locally hosted, customizable cons: Extending needs technical know-how, 6.x-base install, build your own drupal PM will probably meet your needs better if you have the time. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:35, 14 January 2013
Project Management and Issue Tracking Software
- [Basecamp] pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging
- [Redmine] pros: open source, software projects, popular among code4lib responders, ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
- [Asana] pros: free for small groups
- [GitHub] pros: free, hosted, ties together ticketing, source code browsing, and documentation wiki
- [Google Groups] pros: free, good for communication, stores older communication in a browsable way.
- [Google Docs]
- [Unfuddle] pros: hosted ticketing system, customizable cons: customizable
- [Jira] pros: used by the pros cons: costs $$, nightmare to maintain
- [MediaWiki] pros: powers code4lib wiki, open source, customizable, easy for all to use
- [Trello]
- [Minigroup]
- [PBWorks]
- [Trac] pros: ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
- [Open Atrium] pros: drupal distro, locally hosted, customizable cons: Extending needs technical know-how, 6.x-base install, build your own drupal PM will probably meet your needs better if you have the time.
