Difference between revisions of "HAMR: Human/Authority Metadata Reconciliation"

From Code4Lib
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
*** See [https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/PubMedPrefill-pmid+dim.xsl pmid-to-dim.xsl] for a sample XSLT crosswalk to translate PubMed format to a qualified dublin core (internal DSpace metadata format)
 
*** See [https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/PubMedPrefill-pmid+dim.xsl pmid-to-dim.xsl] for a sample XSLT crosswalk to translate PubMed format to a qualified dublin core (internal DSpace metadata format)
 
* crossref
 
* crossref
** simply send the DOI to crossref, and get JSON back
+
** simply send the DOI to crossref, and get JSON/XML back
** example: http://api.labs.crossref.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00626.x.json
+
** http://api.labs.crossref.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00626.x.json
 +
** http://api.labs.crossref.org/10.2307/1935157.xml
 +
** [http://code.google.com/p/dryad/source/browse/trunk/dryad/dspace/modules/doi/dspace-doi-webapp/src/main/java/org/dspace/doi/DOIServlet.java java code that includes a lookup]
 
* google scholar - does it have an API?
 
* google scholar - does it have an API?
 
* [http://www.mendeley.com mendeley] - [http://dev.mendeley.com/ Mendeley API]
 
* [http://www.mendeley.com mendeley] - [http://dev.mendeley.com/ Mendeley API]
 
* [http://vivoweb.org/ vivo]
 
* [http://vivoweb.org/ vivo]
 
* [http://bibapp.org/ bibapp]
 
* [http://bibapp.org/ bibapp]

Revision as of 15:52, 7 February 2011

HAMR: Human/Authority Metadata Reconciliation

Sean Chen, Tim Donohue, Joshua Gomez, Ranti Junus, Ryan Scherle

A tool for a curator to determine whether the various fields of a metadata record are correct. Takes a metadata record, locates any identifiers (e.g., DOI, PMID). Retrieves a copy of the metadata record from an authoritative source (e.g., CrossRef, PubMed). Displays a human-readable page that compares fields in the initial record with fields in the authoritative record. Each field is color-coded based on how well it matches, so the curator can quickly identify discrepancies.


Focus:

  • Dublin core (maybe qualified)
  • framework that allows multiple authority sources
  • NOT focusing on author names (ORCID is already working on this), except the fact that they are strings, and we'll do basic string matching

Possible authority sources: