Difference between revisions of "SirsiDynix: Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source"
From Code4Lib
Anarchivist (Talk | contribs) (→Commentary) |
(→Commentary) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2009-10-30 || Iselid, Lars || [http://nowherenorth.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/anti-open-source-document-sirsidynix-leaked/ Anti open source document from SirsiDynix leaked] | | 2009-10-30 || Iselid, Lars || [http://nowherenorth.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/anti-open-source-document-sirsidynix-leaked/ Anti open source document from SirsiDynix leaked] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2009-10-30 || Lisnews || [http://lisnews.org/sirsidynix_corp_not_very_restricted_lobby_paper_against_open_source_technologies_sep_2009 SirsiDynix Corp [Not Very] restricted lobby paper against Open Source technologies, Sep 2009] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2009-10-31 || Free Software Daily || [http://www.fsdaily.com/Industry/Corporate_lobbying_against_free_software Corporate Lobbying against free software] | | 2009-10-31 || Free Software Daily || [http://www.fsdaily.com/Industry/Corporate_lobbying_against_free_software Corporate Lobbying against free software] |
Revision as of 20:53, 1 November 2009
Background
Around 09-Sept-2009, a SirsiDynix Corp position paper, "Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source" by Vice President of Innovation Stephen Abram, was authored and distributed to a group of SirsiDynix customers.
On 29-Oct-2009, the report was posted on Wikileaks, which "spreads a fantastic amount of fear, uncertainty and doubt about both open source software in general and, more specifically, the suitability of open source integrated library systems" [1].
[1] http://thesecretmirror.com/open-source/leaked-sirsidynix-report
The Report
- Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source
- The report as released by Stephen Abram (pdf)
- Etherpad document for collaborative annotation - limited to 16 users. to just read see SirsiDynix Etherpad
- SirsiDynix Etherpad - Dump of Etherpad (may be out of date)
Commentary
Relevant articles
"Some of the most security-conscious entities, like the United States Department of Defense, restrict the use of open source software for fear that it could pose a terrorist opportunity."
- BRL-CAD
- DOD Says Yes To More Open Source, 28-Oct-2009