Difference between revisions of "SirsiDynix: Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source"
From Code4Lib
(→Commentary) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [http://etherpad.com/9OzS9eowye Etherpad document for collaborative annotation] - limited to 16 users. to just read see [[SirsiDynix Etherpad]] | * [http://etherpad.com/9OzS9eowye Etherpad document for collaborative annotation] - limited to 16 users. to just read see [[SirsiDynix Etherpad]] | ||
* [[SirsiDynix Etherpad]] - Dump of Etherpad (may be out of date) | * [[SirsiDynix Etherpad]] - Dump of Etherpad (may be out of date) | ||
| + | * [[SirsiDynix Google Doc]] - Dump of Google Doc (may be out of date) | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Revision as of 09:03, 4 November 2009
Background
Around 09-Sept-2009, a SirsiDynix Corp position paper, "Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source" by Vice President of Innovation Stephen Abram, was authored and distributed to a group of SirsiDynix customers.
On 29-Oct-2009, the report, which "spreads a fantastic amount of fear, uncertainty and doubt about both open source software in general and, more specifically, the suitability of open source integrated library systems" [1], was posted on Wikileaks.
[1] http://thesecretmirror.com/open-source/leaked-sirsidynix-report
The Report
- Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source
- The report as released by Stephen Abram (pdf)
- Etherpad document for collaborative annotation - limited to 16 users. to just read see SirsiDynix Etherpad
- SirsiDynix Etherpad - Dump of Etherpad (may be out of date)
- SirsiDynix Google Doc - Dump of Google Doc (may be out of date)
Commentary
Relevant articles
"Some of the most security-conscious entities, like the United States Department of Defense, restrict the use of open source software for fear that it could pose a terrorist opportunity."
- BRL-CAD
- DOD Says Yes To More Open Source, 28-Oct-2009
