Difference between revisions of "SirsiDynix: Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source"
From Code4Lib
(→Commentary) |
(→Commentary) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2009-10-30 || Linux Weekly News || http://lwn.net/Articles/359669/ | | 2009-10-30 || Linux Weekly News || http://lwn.net/Articles/359669/ | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2009-10-30 || Library Journal || http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6704622.html | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 02:31, 31 October 2009
Background
Around 09-Sept-2009, a SirsiDynix Corp position paper, "Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source" by Vice President of Innovation Stephen Abram, was authored and distributed to a group of SirsiDynix customers.
On 29-Oct-2009, the report was posted on Wikileaks, which "spreads a fantastic amount of fear, uncertainty and doubt about both open source software in general and, more specifically, the suitability of open source integrated library systems" [1].
[1] http://thesecretmirror.com/open-source/leaked-sirsidynix-report
The Report
- Integrated Library System Platforms on Open Source
- The report as released by Stephen Abram (pdf)
- Etherpad document for collaborative annotation - limited to 16 users. to just read see SirsiDynix Etherpad
- SirsiDynix Etherpad - Dump of Etherpad (may be out of date)
Commentary
| Date | Author | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-29 | Matienzo, Mark | SirsiDynix Report Leaked, Spreading Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt about Open Source |
| 2009-10-30 | Breeding, Marshall | Clifford Lynch clarifies views relative to open source ILS efforts |
| 2009-10-30 | Matienzo, Mark | Clifford Lynch Clarifies Position on Open Source ILSes |
| 2009 | Digg | http://digg.com/software/SirsiDynix_Corp_shovels_open_source_FUD_onto_its_customers |
| 2009-10-30 | Hudson, Alex | Corporate lobbying against free software |
| 2009-10-30 | Abram, Stephen | http://stephenslighthouse.sirsidynix.com/archives/2009/10/its_about_a_res.html |
| 2009-10-30 | Linux Weekly News | http://lwn.net/Articles/359669/ |
| 2009-10-30 | Library Journal | http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6704622.html |
Relevant articles
"Some of the most security-conscious entities, like the United States Department of Defense, restrict the use of open source software for fear that it could pose a terrorist opportunity."
- BRL-CAD
- DOD Says Yes To More Open Source, 28-Oct-2009
