Difference between revisions of "Code4Lib Journal Tech Wishlist"
From Code4Lib
(New page: Things on this page aren't neccesarily consensus, just things people listed as tech wishlist. # Seperate author names in individual fields in db, for better metadata generation. (Then ...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| − | + | * Seperate author names in individual fields in db, for better metadata generation. (Then make export of DOAJ metadata use it, to make it a fully automated process!) | |
| − | + | * epub and/or PDF export of a complete issue | |
| − | + | * Include "cite as" text on each page, with several major citation formats filled in with our data. Especially important because we use an "article number", rather than a page number -- which is supported by most citation formats, but it's not obvious from looking at an article what it's "article number" _is_, you have to know to get it from the URL. Makes it hard to cite correctly. | |
| − | + | * Automated list of "most viewed articles", from WP statistics or Google Analytics? | |
[[Category: Code4Lib Journal]] | [[Category: Code4Lib Journal]] | ||
Revision as of 20:20, 1 February 2011
Things on this page aren't neccesarily consensus, just things people listed as tech wishlist.
- Seperate author names in individual fields in db, for better metadata generation. (Then make export of DOAJ metadata use it, to make it a fully automated process!)
- epub and/or PDF export of a complete issue
- Include "cite as" text on each page, with several major citation formats filled in with our data. Especially important because we use an "article number", rather than a page number -- which is supported by most citation formats, but it's not obvious from looking at an article what it's "article number" _is_, you have to know to get it from the URL. Makes it hard to cite correctly.
- Automated list of "most viewed articles", from WP statistics or Google Analytics?
