Crowdsourced Video QA

Revision as of 02:29, 13 February 2012 by Charper (Talk | contribs) (New page: I've noticed that a number of you all have been watching the rough archived videos in the livestream channel: http://www.livestream.com/code4lib I'm hoping to use these as a foundation fo...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Revision as of 02:29, 13 February 2012 by Charper (Talk | contribs) (New page: I've noticed that a number of you all have been watching the rough archived videos in the livestream channel: http://www.livestream.com/code4lib I'm hoping to use these as a foundation fo...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I've noticed that a number of you all have been watching the rough archived videos in the livestream channel: http://www.livestream.com/code4lib

I'm hoping to use these as a foundation for the "official" archives, but I know there are various gaps, glitches, drops and problems.

As a result, I'd like to crowdsource help with identifying segments that work and segments that don't. For the bad bits, I have a lot of secondary footage on DV tapes, and I'll be working with UW to pull that to file & see what gaps I can fill.

Since I don't necessarily want to watch all 3 days multiple times, I thought I'd ask the community to help me find the problems.

If you've already re-watched a segment in the archives, or looked for something that wasn't there, please add info below. I've copied the schedule here.

Thanks, -chrpr

Segment Quality (Good, Passable, Missing, Drops)