Difference between revisions of "HAMR: Human/Authority Metadata Reconciliation"
From Code4Lib
(New page: HAMR: Human/Authority Metadata Reconciliation Sean Chen, Tim Donohue, Joshua Gomez, Ranti Junus, Ryan Scherle A tool for a curator to determine whether the various fields of a metadat...) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Sean Chen, Tim Donohue, Joshua Gomez, Ranti Junus, Ryan Scherle | Sean Chen, Tim Donohue, Joshua Gomez, Ranti Junus, Ryan Scherle | ||
A tool for a curator to determine whether the various fields of a metadata record are correct. Takes a metadata record, locates any identifiers (e.g., DOI, PMID). Retrieves a copy of the metadata record from an authoritative source (e.g., CrossRef, PubMed). Displays a human-readable page that compares fields in the initial record with fields in the authoritative record. Each field is color-coded based on how well it matches, so the curator can quickly identify discrepancies. | A tool for a curator to determine whether the various fields of a metadata record are correct. Takes a metadata record, locates any identifiers (e.g., DOI, PMID). Retrieves a copy of the metadata record from an authoritative source (e.g., CrossRef, PubMed). Displays a human-readable page that compares fields in the initial record with fields in the authoritative record. Each field is color-coded based on how well it matches, so the curator can quickly identify discrepancies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Focus: | ||
| + | * Dublin core (maybe qualified) | ||
| + | * framework that allows multiple authority sources | ||
| + | * NOT focusing on author names, except the fact that they are strings, and we'll do basic string matching | ||
| + | |||
| + | Possible authority sources: | ||
| + | * pubmed | ||
| + | * crossref | ||
| + | * google scholar | ||
Revision as of 15:28, 7 February 2011
HAMR: Human/Authority Metadata Reconciliation
Sean Chen, Tim Donohue, Joshua Gomez, Ranti Junus, Ryan Scherle A tool for a curator to determine whether the various fields of a metadata record are correct. Takes a metadata record, locates any identifiers (e.g., DOI, PMID). Retrieves a copy of the metadata record from an authoritative source (e.g., CrossRef, PubMed). Displays a human-readable page that compares fields in the initial record with fields in the authoritative record. Each field is color-coded based on how well it matches, so the curator can quickly identify discrepancies.
Focus:
- Dublin core (maybe qualified)
- framework that allows multiple authority sources
- NOT focusing on author names, except the fact that they are strings, and we'll do basic string matching
Possible authority sources:
- pubmed
- crossref
- google scholar
