Difference between revisions of "Logo Design Process"

From Code4Lib
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: = Logo Design Process = This page will document the process we are undertaking to create a logo for Code4Lib. == History == On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant [http://serials.infomotio...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
= Logo Design Process =
 
= Logo Design Process =
  
Line 8: Line 7:
  
 
On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200809/1492.html posted a suggestion] on the Code4Lib mailing list that we create a logo for this group.
 
On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200809/1492.html posted a suggestion] on the Code4Lib mailing list that we create a logo for this group.
 +
 +
There was enough interest expressed that Roy put up an online poll. The result of [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200809/1544.html that vote] indicated a strong interest in creating a logo, but the preferred process for doing so was not clear.
 +
 +
A run-off vote was then held, and "Professional Option 1" [http://dilettantes.code4lib.org/voting_booth/election/results/6 won the vote], which was "We accept Stephanie Brinley's kind offer, request a few different ideas, vote on those ideas to settle on one, and the final version is created from the winning idea."
 +
 +
A [http://serials.infomotions.com/code4lib/archive/2008/200811/1993.html call for volunteers] to draft a requirements document was then made, and Ranti Junus and Emily Molanphy volunteered.

Revision as of 16:52, 3 December 2008

Logo Design Process

This page will document the process we are undertaking to create a logo for Code4Lib.


History

On September 19, 2008 Roy Tennant posted a suggestion on the Code4Lib mailing list that we create a logo for this group.

There was enough interest expressed that Roy put up an online poll. The result of that vote indicated a strong interest in creating a logo, but the preferred process for doing so was not clear.

A run-off vote was then held, and "Professional Option 1" won the vote, which was "We accept Stephanie Brinley's kind offer, request a few different ideas, vote on those ideas to settle on one, and the final version is created from the winning idea."

A call for volunteers to draft a requirements document was then made, and Ranti Junus and Emily Molanphy volunteered.