Difference between revisions of "ProjectManagement"

From Code4Lib
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == Project Management and Issue Tracking Software == * http://basecamp.com/ Basecamp pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* [[http://basecamp.com/ Basecamp]] pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging
 
* [[http://basecamp.com/ Basecamp]] pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging
* [[http://www.redmine.org/ Redmine]] pros: open source, software projects, popular among code4lib responders
+
* [[http://www.redmine.org/ Redmine]] pros: open source, software projects, popular among code4lib responders, ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
 
* [[http://asana.com Asana]] pros: free for small groups
 
* [[http://asana.com Asana]] pros: free for small groups
* [[http://github.com/ GitHub]] pros: free,  hosted
+
* [[http://github.com/ GitHub]] pros: free,  hosted, ties together ticketing, source code browsing, and documentation wiki
* [[https://groups.google.com/ Google Groups]]
+
* [[https://groups.google.com/ Google Groups]] pros: free, good for communication, stores older communication in a browsable way.
 
* [[https://drive.google.com/ Google Docs]]
 
* [[https://drive.google.com/ Google Docs]]
* [[https://unfuddle.com/ Unfuddle]]
+
* [[https://unfuddle.com/ Unfuddle]] pros: hosted ticketing system, customizable  cons: customizable
* [[http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/overview Jira]] pros: used by the pros con: costs $$
+
* [[http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/overview Jira]] pros: used by the pros cons: costs $$, nightmare to maintain
* [[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki]] pros: powers code4lib wiki
+
* [[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki]] pros: powers code4lib wiki, open source, customizable, easy for all to use
 
* [[https://trello.com/ Trello]]
 
* [[https://trello.com/ Trello]]
 
* [[https://minigroup.com/ Minigroup]]
 
* [[https://minigroup.com/ Minigroup]]
 
* [[http://pbworks.com/ PBWorks]]
 
* [[http://pbworks.com/ PBWorks]]
 
* [[http://trac.edgewall.org/ Trac]] pros: ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
 
* [[http://trac.edgewall.org/ Trac]] pros: ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
 +
* [[http://openatrium.com/ Open Atrium]] pros: drupal distro, locally hosted, customizable cons: Extending needs technical know-how, 6.x-base install, build your own drupal PM will probably meet your needs better if you have the time.

Latest revision as of 21:35, 14 January 2013

Project Management and Issue Tracking Software

  • [Basecamp] pros: works well for small groups, good communication cons: easy to outgrow, ticketing challenging
  • [Redmine] pros: open source, software projects, popular among code4lib responders, ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
  • [Asana] pros: free for small groups
  • [GitHub] pros: free, hosted, ties together ticketing, source code browsing, and documentation wiki
  • [Google Groups] pros: free, good for communication, stores older communication in a browsable way.
  • [Google Docs]
  • [Unfuddle] pros: hosted ticketing system, customizable cons: customizable
  • [Jira] pros: used by the pros cons: costs $$, nightmare to maintain
  • [MediaWiki] pros: powers code4lib wiki, open source, customizable, easy for all to use
  • [Trello]
  • [Minigroup]
  • [PBWorks]
  • [Trac] pros: ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing
  • [Open Atrium] pros: drupal distro, locally hosted, customizable cons: Extending needs technical know-how, 6.x-base install, build your own drupal PM will probably meet your needs better if you have the time.