OCLC Policy Change
From Code4Lib
Revision as of 03:22, 9 November 2008 by DataGazetteer (Talk | contribs)
- Policy for Use and Transfer of WorldCat® Records (second and final version)
- Archived copy of first version
- Diff between the two versions
Commentary Regarding First Revision (nov 2)
- pmurray - Is OCLC’s Change of WorldCat Record Use/Transfer Policy Related to the Google Book Search Agreement?
- jrochkind - viral nature of OCLC usage policy–like open source? No.
- Thingology - OCLC Policy Change
- Ed Summers - Bibliovirus
Commentary Regarding Second Revision (nov 5) / General
- jrochkind - More on OCLC’s policies
- jrochkind - copyright trivia, one more
- jrochkind - A logical OCLC argument
- Karen Calhoun - Notes on OCLC's Updated Record Use Policy (NC)
- Repohate - Declaration of Independance of Metadata
- Rob Styles - OCLC, Record Usage, Copyright, Contracts and the Law
- Panlibus - What are OCLC playing at?
- Library Journal - After Delay, OCLC Lays Out New Policy for Records Use and Transfer (NC)
- Terry Reese - OCLC’s proposed new guidelines for the transfer of bibliographic records
- Terry Reese - What would it look like if OCLC was broken up?
- Terry Reese - A look at the Policy for Use and Transfer of WorldCat Records revision
- Ed Corrado - karen calhoun on oclc’s updated record use policy
- Ed Corrado - new oclc policy on worldcat records re-released
- Ed Corrado - update on oclc worldcat policy
- Karen Coombs - Who’s record is it anyway?
- Richard Wallis (Panlibus) - Keeping the WorldCat in the bag
- Open Content Alliance - New OCLC Records Policy Generates Debate
Comments on Comments
Sometimes the best insight comes in the comments added to blog postings and other stories. This Yahoo! Pipe (also available as an RSS feed) is a concatenation of all of the comments from the postings and stories above -- with the exception of those marked "(NC)" because of use of software that doesn't support comment feeds. It was last updated as of page revision 1283.